Now there will be those who will say "but how can you know how well a teacher is teaching unless you factor in student test scores?"It was going to happen eventually. A group of Houston teachers this week will be filing a federal lawsuit challenging the district's teacher evaluation system, based on a "Value-Added" method like Florida's as shown above. Houston's is one of the first to base their evaluations on student test scores.I wonder what her value-added score would have been?This suit is going to draw huge national attention because all over the country, states and school districts are more and more basing their decisions about teacher pay and job security to student test scores. Whereas in the past, those decisions were made on observations of actual teaching.
Well, I teach music. Music isn't a "tested subject". Is it fair that MY job performance is based on a test a student takes that I had nothing to do with?
Up to 70%--that's SEVENTY percent--of all teachers, from early childhood to high school, fall into this category. But it's the Reading and Math tests that they are judged by.
There are NO EXCEPTIONS for special needs kids--they are expected to get the same scores doing the same things as all the other kids. Even though their IEPs say something completely different.
And for what? These tests aren't even a good indicator of student progress anyway.
So what's the solution? First of all, to disabuse ourselves of the notion that children are test scores and can be measured as such. Second, to get administrators out of the offices, and maybe even get them some actual training in observation. Third, how about working to actually keep veteran teachers--you know, the ones that have been there for twenty years and have massive tenure and the salaries to match? Those Master Teachers need to be mentors and also can help with the observation and evaluation process.
Finally,